auto collision repair products

Ford’s big aluminum show-and-tell

Ford engineer Gerry Bonanni says the construction of the 2015 aluminum F-150 will allow easier repairs. “The advantage to the technician and body shop is they have repair options they would not have had.”

By Bradford Wernle

NADA pitch aims to reassure dealers on repair issues

It wasn’t your typical convention display: a color-coded body-in-white cutaway of the Ford F-150 pickup that looked like an oversized Fisher-Price toy.

But Ford Motor Co. was using the toy store approach to make a serious point to dealers: The economics of an aluminum truck – both the repair costs for the customer and the body shop operations for the dealer – make sense.

“We’ve made a lot of really significant changes for repairability,” Jim Farley, Ford global vice president of marketing, sales, service and Lincoln, said at the National Automobile Dealers Association convention here. “They will help save a lot of labor costs.”

For those with an engineering bent, the display provided a fascinating first look at how construction and repair of the nation’s top-selling vehicle will change with the aluminum redesign.

Read the full article at

PCI Special Report on Aftermarket Parts

In a January 2013 study from the Property Casualty Insurers of America (PCI), their own research shows that if Aftermarket parts were banned, this would result in a $24.00 overall increase in premium prices per insured car per year.

Excerpted from the report:

This PCI Special Report provides an update of the estimated cost impact resulting from the banning of aftermarket parts.

  • If non-OEM competitive replacement parts are no longer used, this may result in an additional $2.34 billion in insurance costs per year that could be passed on to drivers in the form of higher premiums.
  • The insurance premium reflecting vehicle damage coverages may increase by about 4.2 percent more per insured car. This translates into a 2.6 percent increase in the combined liability and physical damage premium per insured car if non-OEM parts could no longer be used. On average, this means about $24 added to the overall premium per insured car each year.

Is the friction, the argument and the concern over using aftermarket parts really worth $24.00 per year per insured vehicle?

Read the full PCI Special Report (PDF download)

Additional Costs of Using LKQ Quarter Panels

LKQ Quarter Replacement

by DEG Administrator Art Harris

Given the amount of inquiries that we receive at the DEG I assume the replacement of a quarter panel with a used part is still a valid repair scenario for some vehicles. I would challenge that if you look at the necessary steps needed to replace a quarter panel with a used part it could not be cost effective. Now, if you are using a fictitious number like “4 hours” to remove the outer skin from the donor part then yes, on paper, it may be a valid and cost effective repair but I assure you that each vehicle is different and requires different labor times to remove the used quarter from the donor vehicle. Let’s take a closer look:

First, all three estimating systems Audatex, CCC and Mitchell create the time to replace an LKQ quarter panel base on the fact that you will be replacing the outer and inner components as a complete assembly which I am sure is not how most of us are replacing that used panel . Typically we are removing the outer skin and replacing that part only. I think the “4 hours” that some adjusters still use is based on the outdated idea of trimming the parts to be replaced as the entire component inner and outer, which is still incorrect and should vary from vehicle to vehicle.

Second each vehicle requires a different amount of time to remove the outer quarter skin from the donor part. An example could be most vehicles have an excessive amount of foams and sealers that need to be carefully removed so not to damage the LKQ part but that amount varies from each vehicle. If you look at most LKQ quarter prices versus the OEM price the difference is in the $300 to $350 range after markup and by using the fictitious  4 hours, yes, it would be cost effective but if you were to breakdown each step needed , AND charge for that step it will not be cost effective. Think of the amount of time needed just to remove all the components from the donor vehicle;

  1. Quarter glass (on some vehicles)
  2. Back glass or a portion. Most LKQ parts are delivered with a portion of the glass still attached
  3. Moldings and trim
  4. Splash shields
  5. Inner trim inside trunk
  6. Trunk hinge
  7. Quarter vents
  8. Door opening weatherstrips
  9. Door latch on dog leg
  10. Door sensors and plugs located on dog leg

These items alone could account for a majority of the cost saving from the LKQ part versus the OE part and we have not started the removal process yet.

Now that all the additional items are removed from the LKQ part we can look at the tedious task of removing the skin form the donor part. One of the first steps is removing the seam sealers, urethanes and paint from the part to access the spot welds. Looking at a corolla there is about 25+ feet of pinch welds, and flat surfaces that need to be ground to access the welds or to prep the surface for welding. 25 feet!! After that we need to drill out spot welds, which could be 60+ welds, separate the panels, clean the removed panel and dress the flanges that where damaged by removal, clean the matting surfaces then if all goes well we have a part than could be welded to the customer’s vehicle.

Spelling this out on paper does not give it justice. I recommend visiting the DEG website and viewing the video that Toby Chess had completed for a past CIC meeting of the necessary steps needed to remove the outer skin from the donor vehicle. After viewing the video I think you will agree that each vehicle requires its own evaluation of time and the “4 hours” that is typically used IS NOT SUFFICIENT in most repair scenarios. You can view the video by visiting the DEG website at then select the “Get Educated” Tab and click “Knowledge Base”, or by clicking the link here.

Chicagoland Suppliers Resisting PartsTrader

By Kristen Hampshire, BodyShop Business

On Sept. 17, 2012, State Farm announced that the pilot program for PartsTrader was being expanded to Chicago, and collision repairers would start actively using it in December. In short order, they reported that 475 of 477 Select Service repairers in Chicago had registered for the program. Today, State Farm says all 477 have now signed up. But supplier participation is another story.

More than a few repairers are reporting that many suppliers are actively resisting PartsTrader. One shop reported that State Farm sent it a letter indicating only 48 percent of its suppliers had completed the registration process. The insurer says 266 suppliers of all part types to date are participating in PartsTrader.

“Data provided by PartsTrader suggests Chicago suppliers that are actively participating in the quoting process are generating more parts orders overall than those who have opted to only receive fax orders,” said George Avery, claims consultant with State Farm.

And as roll-out continues, Avery says that PartsTrader data also suggests repairers are shifting to participating suppliers from fax-only suppliers.

One repairer says PartsTrader has been shutting down its fax service at 5 p.m. Then, at 8:30 a.m., the fax machine is spitting out pages of parts orders that had been entered via PartsTrader at 3 p.m. the day before. He said PartsTrader has stated the fax service will end in 2014. He also said it seems PartsTrader is “punishing” dealers that have chosen the fax route. Evidence, he claims, is listing one of the largest Chrysler dealers in the area as an Isuzu/Suzuki dealer.

“That took several phone calls to change, and who knows if it will change back?” he said.

Read the full article – Chicagoland Suppliers Resisting PartsTrader

American Honda Launches Airbag Awareness Website

From CollisionWeek©

American Honda announced the launch of a new consumer website,, designed to increase awareness among consumers about the growing problem of counterfeit airbags.

Included on the site is the original October 2012 NHTSA Counterfeit Air Bag Consumer Alert, stories of those people facing criminal charges for selling counterfeit airbags, a dramatic video showing the deployment of several counterfeit airbags versus Honda Genuine airbags, and more. The website will be free-standing, but will be connected to the existing American Honda consumer website,

Jim Roach, Senior Vice President for American Honda’s Parts and Service Division said, “Counterfeit airbags are a growing concern because of the potential danger they pose not only to Honda owners, but to the general public. Every Honda owner should visit this new site to understand why they should demand that their collision-damaged car is properly and safely repaired.”

To promote the new website and increase consumer awareness, Honda dealers will be receiving a supply of Consumer Information Kits including a small supply of kits to distribute to collision repair shops. Shops can order additional kits, free of charge, by calling 440-572-7266 and order item #CPHABK12. The site will also be supported through advertising in various collision industry magazines.

Collision Repair Education Foundation Announces $50,000 Makeover Winners

From CollisionWeek ©

The Collision Repair Education Foundation announced the two winning Ultimate Collision Education Makeover winning schools during the organization’s industry reception held during the SEMA 2012. Nichols Career Center (Jefferson City, MO) was selected as the secondary school Makeover winner and Manhattan Area Technical College (Manhattan, KS) was selected as the post-secondary Makeover winner.

Seventy schools from thirty one states applied for the 2012 Makeover grant and a selection committee made up of the Education Foundation’s volunteer Board of Trustees selected the two schools. Over the next several months, the Education Foundation will be working to fulfill the two school’s collision programs $50,000 wish lists of needed tools equipment and supplies.

Collision Repair Education Foundation Executive Director Clark Plucinski noted, “It was great bringing the collision industry together during our industry reception to not only highlight the support the organization has provided to collision school programs through the generosity of our industry donors but also surprise both of these instructors that their collision programs will have their $50,000 wish lists fulfilled. We look forward to working together with not only the two winning schools but also focusing support on all of the applicant schools, as they took the time and effort to let us know their specific collision needs. Congratulations again to both Nichols Career Center and Manhattan Area Technical College!”

In addition to fulfilling the full wish lists of the two winning schools, as the Makeover application requires that all applicant schools provide an itemized $50,000 collision wish lists, the Education Foundation will be sharing the applicant school’s specific requests with the company’s represented in order to help as many collision programs as possible. Industry members interested in participating with the Collision Repair Education Foundation’s Makeover winning school and/or the other applicants, please contact Director of Development, Brandon Eckenrode at or 847-463-5244.

Who should pay for counterfeit airbag replacements?

From Automotive News

By Theresa Clift – 11 Oct 2012

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s industry alert that warned about the proliferation of counterfeit airbags on Wednesday could spark legal debates about who should pay the cost of replacing the potentially dangerous parts.

The National Automobile Dealers Association said although counterfeiters are to blame for the issue, it is consumers who will bear all costs — about $100 for inspection and $750 to $1,000 or more for replacement.

But safety advocate Clarence Ditlow, executive director for the Center for Auto Safety, disagrees.

“Once counterfeit is detected, the original repair shop has to bear the cost of replacing the counterfeit,” Ditlow said in an e-mail to Automotive News today. “If they won’t do it voluntarily, the consumer should take them to small claims court.”

Ohio trial lawyer Dennis Murray agreed.

“If [the inspection shows] it is a bogus device, then of course, the cost burden and replacement cost would be upon the individual repair shop,” he said in an e-mail.

In California, dealers who install a fraudulent airbag and then refuse to pay for the replacement are guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a $5,000 fine, imprisonment in a county jail for one year, or both. A state law passed last year making it a crime to fraudulently repair airbags, including using a counterfeit airbag.

Other state laws

Another such law exists in Rhode Island, and more states will pass similar laws in the future, Ditlow said.

Dealerships that did not install the faulty airbag are not required to pay for inspection or repair. But Ditlow’s organization believes it would be good business for dealerships to do airbag inspections for free, even if it was installed elsewhere — the way some stores inspect child seats for proper installation.

A diagnostic scan should detect most counterfeit airbags, but it may not detect all of them, so to be sure, the service operation should also do physical inspections, Ditlow said.

Most airbag replacements are covered by insurers, he said.

“Airbags save several thousands of lives annually, but they can’t save lives if they have not been repaired properly,” Ditlow said in his e-mail. “Every year, about 1.5 million airbags are deployed in police-reported tow-away crashes, according to NHTSA.”

NHTSA said it is not aware of any deaths or injuries related to the counterfeit airbags — which also can expel metal shrapnel during deployment.

Only vehicles that may have had an airbag replaced in the past three years by a repair shop not part of new car dealership may be at risk, the safety agency said.

NHTSA believes the issue affects less than 0.1 percent of the U.S. vehicle fleet.

SCRA GCIA 2013 Consumer Calendar Program

A message from Aaron Schulenburg
Executive Director, Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS)

Good morning!

I hope that as SCRS Affiliate associations that many of you may have considered how you could co-brand your association to future or existing members by using the SCRS 2013 consumer tip calendar. The production company is taking orders through next week, and I want to encourage you all to take advantage of this great product that came from much of our collaborative discussions. If you want to order, please visit

The types of consumer messaging include tips such as:

  1. Many people begin their auto insurance policy search looking for the least expensive policy they can buy. A cheaper policy may cost less in premiums, but can cost you more overall if the insurer low-balls estimates, won’t work with your repair shop or forces you to pay extra for genuine manufacturer parts or manufacturer approved repair processes. Ask about policy coverage prior to purchase to find the protection you want at a price you’re willing to pay.
  2. Insurance companies are not supposed to force you to use any particular repair shop, but your insurer might push you to use shops in their direct-repair program (DRP). Being on a DRP, doesn’t necessarily mean a shop is good or bad, but studies have shown that customer satisfaction with repairs was significantly lower among those who felt pressured to use the insurer’s preferred shop, rather than a repair facility of their own choice. Do research before you need to have your vehicle repaired, take the advice of friends and family, look at online reviews and find a repair facility you can trust. It’s your car, and it is always your choice as to who repairs it!
  3. Automobile technology is rapidly advancing, and you want to work with a collision repair facility that has invested in the most current equipment and training to return your vehicle to its former state; safely transporting you and your family down the road. Collision repair professionals should transparently explain how your vehicle will be repaired and what the costs associated with those repairs will be. Understand that they may not be willing to compromise on their repair approach because of the liability associated with improperly repairing vehicles. A written guarantee demonstrates that they stand behind their work.

Obviously, there are 14 months of tips, but this gives you an idea of the types of messaging we used, much of which was collected from input from our membership. Again, if you are interested in ordering these calendar’s with your associations logo and information custom imprinted into it, they are only $1.99 and can be ordered by clicking here:

Looking forward to promoting good consumer understanding of their rights with you!
Aaron Schulenburg
Executive Director | Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS)

877.435.6028 Fax
PO Box 346 Smyrna DE 19977

SCRS Consumer Message Point 2013 Calendars

It’s not too early to start thinking about 2013! Ordering your personalized SCRS calendars now has many advantages:

  • Early shipping – receive your calendars and take care of your marketing for 2013 before the hectic winter rush
  • Show your appreciation – give your customers a Thanksgiving gift they’ll use and appreciate, and remember you for
  • 13-month exposure – distribute your calendars before year’s end so your customers can start using them in December 2012, maximizing your marketing dollars
  • Guaranteed in-stock – no need to worry about missing out on these fantastic marketing tools.

Get your business name out in the marketplace earlier – before your competitors – and for a longer period of time with the 2013 SCRS custom calendar.

Call toll-free 1-877-544-4575 or email to order today!

For more information about the 2013 SCRS Calendar Program, click here.

SCRS Reports Early Jump in SEMA Registrations

From CollisionWeek©

The Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS) announced that pre-registration for its Repairer Driven Education (RDE) series at the SEMA Show is tracking a nearly 300 percent increase in registrations through the end of July.

“The first two years of the RDE program brought a lot of very positive response from the attendees, and we believe that the numbers clearly indicate that our program at the SEMA Show is delivering exactly what the industry is looking for right now,” shared SCRS Chairman Aaron Clark. “We have worked hard to put together a program that specifically addresses solutions to existing business conditions, and are glad to see the industry responding with early approval!”

SCRS has also reported expansion in the participant demographics. In addition to a large independent collision repair attendee base from the U.S., 2012 numbers have indicated notable additional growth in participation from Multi-Shop Operators (MSO), as well as from international automotive businesses currently representing more than a dozen different countries.

Show management numbers through the end of July indicated an increase in both collision industry exhibitor counts, as well as double digit growth in square footage occupied by exhibiting collision industry companies.

A complete listing of the RDE sessions can be found at

Upcoming Events